On Jul 5, 2008, at 7:59 PM, Grey Man wrote: > From what I can gather the suggestion from the FS approach is that > each Asterisk channel should be handled after by it's own unique > thread and save the need for any locking on the channel data > structures in the first place.
Having a thread per channel _absolutely does NOT_ remove the need for locking to synchronize access to channel data structures. -- Russell Bryant Senior Software Engineer Open Source Team Lead Digium, Inc. _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
