Dave Fullerton wrote: > It is true that this method would require more configuration work and > that it would probably throw people off who were used to the old method. > However, I don't agree that it leaves more room for error. The current > system, IMHO, has a certain amount of ambiguity to it. If I inherit a > production system from someone, I can't tell for sure what the echo > canceller setup is just by looking at system.conf. I have to look at > system.conf and then know if hardware echo can is present. Aside from > opening the case or looking at dmesg output, I'm not even sure how to > see if a hardware echocan is present or not.
The dahdi_scan tool will tell you whether hardware echocans are present or not, among other methods. -- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA skype: kpfleming | jabber: [email protected] Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org _______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona Register Now: http://www.astricon.net asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
