Ben Dinnerville wrote: > Why dont you use the MixMonitor application which allows for a system > command to be passed in as an argument that is executed once the > recording is finished??? - > > MixMonitor(<file>.<ext>[|<options>[|<command>]]) > > <command> will be executed when the recording is over.
I did briefly consider that, but thought what I was trying to do should be perfectly feasible. > Sorry, Monitor also has the "flag" param which allows you to execute a > command post recording if you want to stick with Monitor and not > MixMonitor. The monitor() works perfectly well, my only issue was getting a command executed after the recording was done. I might take another look at mixmonitor(), but as I've got it working now, and it's not exactly going to be used a lot, well ... /Per Jessen, Zürich -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
