*bump*
(B
(Bwoops..this isn't a forum...
(B
(Bbut anyway, this is a good question. We will soon have somewhere in the 500
(BSIP users range and if I can have 1 machine (SER) handle all the
(Bregistration (hopefully out of a database) that will defiantly reduce the
(Bload on my asterisk servers.
(B
(BI've also heard that SER can do load balancing between multiple * servers.
(BAny comments/HOWTOs on that?
(B
(BThanks,
(BMatthew
(B----- Original Message -----
(BFrom: "Kuniyoshi Murata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BTo: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(BSent: Sunday, November 21, 2004 6:24 PM
(BSubject: [Asterisk-Users] SER is a better NAT solution?
(B
(B
(B> Hi,
(B>
(B> I'm now setting up a VoIP conference room using Asterisk.
(B>
(B> All the clients are SIP phone (to be exact, Xlite), number of clients that
(Bshould be registered are around 50 and concurrent users are maybe 15 clients
(Bat most.
(B>
(B> So, basically I think I can handle the situation only with Asterisk.
(B> I'm wondering however, most of my clients are behind NAT of home router
(Band using SER together with Asterisk sounds better solution.
(B>
(B> Is there significant difference between SER and Asterisk, for handling SIP
(Bphones behind NAT?
(B>
(B> --
(B> Kuniyoshi Murata.........................iChat/AIM:macwebcaster
(B> English-Japanese Interpreter mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B> Macintosh Webcast Specialist http://www.macwebcaster.com
(B> _______________________________________________
(B> Asterisk-Users mailing list
(B> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
(B> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
(B> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
(B
(B_______________________________________________
(BAsterisk-Users mailing list
([EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Bhttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
(BTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
(B http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
