Yes, exactly! I think 100,000 phones all regeristing every 60 seconds would put quite a load. And if 50% of them are all behind NAT/FW, asterisk wouldn't play nice, would it?
So, is SER a better option for this? -Matthew ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Riddell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 5:38 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SER is a better NAT solution? Addendum: LinksysWRT54G > Tracy R Reed wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 10:00:48AM -0500, Paul Rodan spake thusly: > > > >>I am quite interested in this as well. I didn't realize registrations are > >>the #1 cause of load on an asterisk server, we haven't gotten to that kind > >>of usage just yet. > > > > > > I don't think they are, are they? How could a few registration packets > > per phone once an hour come anywhere near the load of a single sip session? > > I guess if you have 100,000 customers. Say 5-10% are making calls and > yet all of them register? > > Maybe. > > -- > Cheers, > > Matt Riddell > _______________________________________________ > > http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html) > http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss) > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
