STUN requires 2 NIC interfaces on the machine running the server right? And both interfaces need seperate public IP's right? 'And' the phones/ATA's need to support STUN right? I don't think the Cisco phones support STUN.
-Matthew ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Wilkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 4:25 AM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SER is a better NAT solution? Addendum:LinksysWRT54G > If you had 100,000 phones registering to the Asterisk server, I would think > you would have at least two or three more Asterisk servers for people to > point to their devices to. Who is to say that SER won't crash with 100,000 > registrations either? You could always use a STUN server on each Asterisk box > and that will work perfectly. > > > On Tuesday 23 November 2004 03:13 pm, Matthew Boehm wrote: > > Yes, exactly! I think 100,000 phones all regeristing every 60 seconds would > > put quite a load. And if 50% of them are all behind NAT/FW, asterisk > > wouldn't play nice, would it? > > > > So, is SER a better option for this? > > > > -Matthew > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Matt Riddell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 5:38 PM > > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SER is a better NAT solution? Addendum: > > LinksysWRT54G > > > > > Tracy R Reed wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 10:00:48AM -0500, Paul Rodan spake thusly: > > > >>I am quite interested in this as well. I didn't realize registrations > > > > are > > > > > >>the #1 cause of load on an asterisk server, we haven't gotten to that > > > > kind > > > > > >>of usage just yet. > > > > > > > > I don't think they are, are they? How could a few registration packets > > > > per phone once an hour come anywhere near the load of a single sip > > > > session? > > > > > I guess if you have 100,000 customers. Say 5-10% are making calls and > > > yet all of them register? > > > > > > Maybe. > > > > > > -- > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Matt Riddell > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html) > > > http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss) > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > -- > Brian Wilkins > Software Engineer > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Heritage Communications Corporation > Melbourne, FL USA 32935 > 321.308.4000 x33 > http://www.hcc.net > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
