On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 15:40 -0500, Brian Capouch wrote: > Olson, Dana wrote: > > > Anyhow, thanks to those who could see past the petty details, and sorry for > > pissing off those who can't. > > > > For what it's worth, back in the day I used to heat up red hot when I > saw Critch's tart responses to newbie questions. > > Now that I'm doing the daily battle to read every mail on all the > Asterisk lists, I've changed my tune somewhat. > > You should accept the fact that his approach got your attention, and > that on the main he was right: you admit you didn't look very hard, you > did in fact send a mail with a noxious dislaimer, and worst, you sent it > in HTML. > > Take your lumps and move on, and recognize that Steve's contribution to > this list, while undeniably unpleasant when dished out, in the main is > performing a valuable service for all of those who strive to learn more > about Asterisk.
While I thank those who come to my defense, I thought my first post was rather tame. I made the remarks about content and then proceeded to answer questions. If I am wrong and I wasn't tame, then maybe there is a disconnect between myself and others about what should be offensive. It does seem that Dana is taking the suggestions to heart and is changing for the better. -- Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
