Am 16.05.2012 um 17:54 schrieb James Babiak:

> Michael,
> 
> I've never personally used the SPA8000, but I do have a lot of experience 
> with the SPA3102 (one FXO/one FXS) ATA. I like it. Fairly inexpensive, and 
> works very well. I've used it with voice and faxing, and overall have had 
> almost no issues. Highly configurable as well, unlike the Grandstream ATAs.
> 
> -James
> 
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Michael Keuter <li...@mksolutions.info> 
> wrote:
> Hi James,
> 
> Thanks for your honest words :-).
> Any experiences with the Cisco/Linksys SPA8000?
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> Michael

I use the PAP2T (2x FXS) for some years, but only for 2 old analogue phones and 
it works well (incl. provisioning).
It seems to be kind of the same family of ATAs. But I never used it for faxing 
(this European version doesn't do T.38).

Michael

http://www.mksolutions.info




Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Astlinux-users mailing list
Astlinux-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users

Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to 
pay...@krisk.org.

Reply via email to