On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Ben Greear <[email protected]> wrote: > Do you have any reason to believe the problem is in the driver or mac80211 > stack, or is this all a firmware issue? Because the rate control logic is embedded in the firmware (I believe this is the reason why we don't have a nice 'rc_stats' table) seems to point to a firmware issue.
> And, if anyone has a different /AC NIC that can do IBSS, I'm curious > if ath10k will receive at higher speeds? So I just created an adhoc network with an ath9k radio (HT40+) with an ath10k radio (with HT40+) and found that the ath9k stayed at HT40/SGI MCS7. Checking on the ath10k, I found the same rate (150mbps) was being used. A very interesting note, however, is that realistic transfer rates are 27mbps TCP, 37mbps UDP from ath9k->ath10k. ath10k->ath9k has realistic transfer rates of 4.17mbps TCP, 5.18mbps UDP and rates go back to the 6mbps we see earlier. - Pushpal _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
