On 12/01/2014 09:38 AM, Pushpal Sidhu wrote: > On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Ben Greear <[email protected]> wrote: >> Do you have any reason to believe the problem is in the driver or mac80211 >> stack, or is this all a firmware issue? > Because the rate control logic is embedded in the firmware (I believe > this is the reason why we don't have a nice 'rc_stats' table) seems to > point to a firmware issue. > >> And, if anyone has a different /AC NIC that can do IBSS, I'm curious >> if ath10k will receive at higher speeds? > So I just created an adhoc network with an ath9k radio (HT40+) with an > ath10k radio (with HT40+) and found that the ath9k stayed at HT40/SGI > MCS7. Checking on the ath10k, I found the same rate (150mbps) was > being used. > > A very interesting note, however, is that realistic transfer rates are > 27mbps TCP, 37mbps UDP from ath9k->ath10k. ath10k->ath9k has realistic > transfer rates of 4.17mbps TCP, 5.18mbps UDP and rates go back to the > 6mbps we see earlier.
It may be a bit before I can get back to working on this effort, but I am reading the email and it will help me when I do have time to work on this again. If you have time, can you see if you can get encryption working with ath9k to ath9k? I could not get that working, and I am not sure if it is my supplicant setup or if I have some other bugs somewhere... Please post config files if you do get it working. And, what is ath9k to ath9k transfer rates? Thanks, Ben > > - Pushpal > -- Ben Greear <[email protected]> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
