On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:12 AM, Xu, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all:
> I have a patch that can be used to fix the bug.
> The patch resolved the issue by disabling the beacon filter when 
> disassociated with AP and enabling beacon when associate with AP.
> See http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11749
> Please review it. Thanks!

Thanks for the patch!

I think the basic idea is ok (we only have beacons if PRBRESP_PROMISC is set
or if we are in STA mode _and_ associated, or in IBSS mode).  However, there
are lots of CodingStyle issues with the patch.  Please run
scripts/checkpatch.pl on it and fix the corresponding whitespace issues.

+static void
+enable_beacon_filter(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
+{
+        struct ath5k_softc *sc = hw->priv;
+        struct ath5k_hw *ah = sc->ah;
+        u32 rfilt;
+        rfilt = ath5k_hw_get_rx_filter(ah);
+        if ( !(rfilt & AR5K_RX_FILTER_BEACON) ){

Probably not worth it to do the test, since this isn't going to get
called that often.

+                rfilt |= AR5K_RX_FILTER_BEACON;
+                ath5k_hw_set_rx_filter(ah,rfilt);
+                sc->filter_flags = rfilt;
+        }
+        rfilt = ath5k_hw_get_rx_filter(ah);
+        return;

Above two lines are unnecessary.

+}

You remove a heap of code by making this set_beacon_filter(hw, bool enable)
and cleaning up the branches in bss_info_changed.  I believe this can race
with configure_filter as well (but configure_filter already races with
anything that touches sc->status...).

> @@ -179,6 +179,7 @@ struct ath5k_softc {
>
>        struct timer_list       calib_tim;      /* calibration timer */
>        int                     power_level;    /* Requested tx power in dbm */
> +       bool                    assoc;          /* assocate state */
>  };

s/assocate/associate.  Also in ath5k we sometimes use sc->status for such
flags, though this could go either way.

-- 
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com
_______________________________________________
ath5k-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel

Reply via email to