Re: old section 4 diagram

[James M Snell]

Tim Bray wrote:

On Jan 23, 2006, at 6:48 AM, Joe Gregorio wrote:

And since this is feedback on -07, please add back in the
diagram [1] or write a Pace to have it removed.

[1] http://bitworking.org/projects/atom/draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-06.html#rfc.section.4

Disagree. I think this was a good editorial decision that had zero effect on the definition of the protocol and removed non-information-bearing fluff. -Tim

+1.

- James