On 1/24/06, Tim Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 23, 2006, at 6:48 AM, Joe Gregorio wrote: > > > And since this is feedback on -07, please add back in the > > diagram [1] or write a Pace to have it removed. > > > > [1] http://bitworking.org/projects/atom/draft-ietf-atompub- > > protocol-06.html#rfc.section.4 > > Disagree. I think this was a good editorial decision that had zero > effect on the definition of the protocol and removed non-information- > bearing fluff. -Tim
During a previous round of edits I was criticized for editing material that wasn't covered by a Pace. On the very next round of edits you do the same thing you just criticized me for. Write. A. Pace. -joe -- Joe Gregorio http://bitworking.org
