On 5/2/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, the first draft of PaceMediaEntries4 has been posted, incorporating the feedback from Tim and clarifying the point that media link entries MUST contain an atom:summary element and that servers may populate required elements with content derived from the media resource or any other source. http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceMediaEntries4
-1 to PaceMediaEntries4 since it makes the return of an Atom Entry on POST a MAY instead of a SHOULD. Honestly I haven't seen a compelling reason why it shouldn't be a MUST, but anyway, I thought we'd talked that to death and only Tim was opposed? The other changes are ok and I would be +1 on a Pace with them as long as it kept Atom Entries on a POST response a SHOULD. Thanks, -joe -- Joe Gregorio http://bitworking.org
