On 5/7/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, I've been going back through all of the discussion on the topic and
I think it is very clearly leaning in favor of SHOULD or MUST... of
course, Tim and Paul would be the ones to say for sure. I've updated
the Pace from MAY to SHOULD.
How it now reads:
When the server generates a response with a status code of 201
("Created"), it SHOULD also return a response body, which, if
provided, MUST be an Atom Entry Document representing the
newly-created resource. Clients MUST NOT assume that an Atom Entry
returned is a full representation of the member resource and SHOULD
perform a GET on the member resource before editing.
How's that?
That's great, count me as +1.
Thanks,
-joe
--
Joe Gregorio http://bitworking.org
