On 5/7/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When the server generates a response with a status code of 201
("Created"), it SHOULD also return a response body, which, if
provided, MUST be an Atom Entry Document representing the
newly-created resource. Clients MUST NOT assume that an Atom Entry
returned is a full representation of the member resource and SHOULD
perform a GET on the member resource before editing.
How's that?
Not very good. Explain the consequence of ignoring the SHOULD. RFC
4287 doesn't do that, and is worse for it.
--
Robert Sayre
"I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."
