Joe Gregorio wrote:
> [snip]
>> 7.1 Should we have language-aware titles in app:collection? 7.2.2.1
>> says that @title is language sensitive. I guess you may use xml:lang,
>> but what about multiple language versions of the title.
>
> Bah, you're right, @title should be an element not an attribute
> and we should allow mulitple child elements as long as none
> of them have the same xml:lang value. Good catch.
>
+1. However, IMHO, making this kind of change would make obvious the
need to have some means of uniquely identifying a collection within the
introspection document. I'm not convinced that the href is good enough.
(yes, I know this has been discussed before, but I don't believe we ever
adequately resolved it).
> [snip]
>> 8.3 I guess it makes sense for link/@rel=edit to be optional, but what
>> about link/@rel=self? I didn't find the word 'self' in the
>> specification. Google seems to require 'self' relationship in their
>> posts and I like to have both a separation between GET/PUT for member
>> URIs.
>
> How could GData require a [EMAIL PROTECTED]"self" on a POST when
> the POST is a request to create the resource? I'm pretty sure I'm missing
> something here...
>
The entries created by Gdata have a [EMAIL PROTECTED]"self" as well as a
[EMAIL PROTECTED]"edit". They don't require it on POST, but the self link
serves a functional purpose.
- James
