Henry Story wrote:
On 6 Jul 2006, at 06:32, James M Snell wrote:
Joe Gregorio wrote:
[snip]
7.1 Should we have language-aware titles in app:collection? 7.2.2.1
says that @title is language sensitive. I guess you may use xml:lang,
but what about multiple language versions of the title.
Bah, you're right, @title should be an element not an attribute
and we should allow mulitple child elements as long as none
of them have the same xml:lang value. Good catch.
+1. However, IMHO, making this kind of change would make obvious the
need to have some means of uniquely identifying a collection within the
introspection document. I'm not convinced that the href is good enough.
(yes, I know this has been discussed before, but I don't believe we ever
adequately resolved it).
As mentioned in a different thread here recently (sorry for being a
little indelicate there - it was very hot and moist here yesterday), I
think the spec would get out of the door fastest if the <service>
document is removed from the spec completely. If something like this is
really needed it can always be defined in a different spec. The protocol
spec should narrow its focus on protocol issues as much as possible. A
new document is not needed to get the work done.
I filed a pace for titles. If that gets accepted, I'd like to look at
edit distance between gdata, introspections and feeds, and think this
"use a feed idea" over.
cheers
Bill
