On Jul 5, 2006, at 7:14 PM, Eric Scheid wrote:
A server can, if it wished, generate broken and invalid XML. We
wouldn't
consider it compliant with the RFC though, right?
So, the real question is then: what should a server do, so as to be
considered compliant with this particular spec?
It should update the atom:updated value when a change occurs in the
entry that it considers to be significant. What is hard to
understand about this? The WG invested a thousand or so messages
establishing that any attempt to micromanage publishing-system
policies on this subject is not feasible. -Tim
