Henry Story wrote:
Where do we stop?
We will end up having over an denumerable number of mime types if we
continue this way.
Why is it then that in rdf I can do all of the above with just the same
mime type?
You can't. You don't understand how RDF interacts with media types. I've
already mentioned this to you today, but you've chosen to disregard it.
Do some research, gain some understanding and if you want to pursue it,
take this up with the W3C TAG or the IESG. It's not appropriate work for
this group.
You have in now way argued that a new mime-type will hurt
interop or violate the architecture of the web.
So how would an infinite numbers of mime types help interoperability?
That's a bad argument. I can't be bothered looking up which one.
cheers
Bill
