--- Tim Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > See > http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceDeclareVictoryOnFormat > > The world can use Atom, sooner rather than later. > The > return-on-investment of further WG time invested in > polishing something > that's already pretty good is starting to be very > unattractive. > Particularly when the Protocol draft seriously needs > work and progress. -1 So far Atom is a less featureful version of RSS 2.0. I was actually thinking about that this weekend while reading Charles Miller's post at http://fishbowl.pastiche.org/2004/11/08/finally_a_use_for_atom and realizing that my internal data models in RSS Bandit haven't changed one whit because of Atom, just the parsing code. As it stands now given the current cost/benefit of Atom over RSS 2.0, the current Atom draft + categories isn't something I'd advise anyone at my employer's to use if it became an RFC nor is it something I believe we'd use on the stuff I work on directly (http://spaces.msn.com for one). ===== THINGS TO DO IF I BECOME AN EVIL OVERLORD #222 I reserve the right to execute any henchmen who appear to be a little too intelligent, powerful, or devious. However if I do so, I will not at some subsequent point shout "Why am I surrounded by these incompetent fools?!" __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. www.yahoo.com
