--- Robert Sayre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That's fine. It is often good practice to leave
> aspects of a spec
> undefined. What's not OK is to "clarify" them
> without revving the spec.
Someone should explain that to the W3C then since that
is standard practice there. Of course, this is a lot
better than the IETF which just abandons specs once
they throw them out there. Trying to figure out how to
implement NNTP support from the relevant IETF specs
was a joke given how far practice had outpaced the
much outdated RFCs.
Like I said, as someone who's spent the past few years
working with specs produced by standards bodies I find
the complaints about RSS 2.0, etc to consist mainly of
nitpicking.
=====
THINGS TO DO IF I BECOME AN EVIL OVERLORD #222
I reserve the right to execute any henchmen who appear to be a little too
intelligent, powerful, or devious. However if I do so, I will not at some
subsequent point shout "Why am I surrounded by these incompetent fools?!"
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.
www.yahoo.com
