Dare Obasanjo wrote:
--- Robert Sayre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's fine. It is often good practice to leave
aspects of a spec undefined. What's not OK is to "clarify" them
without revving the spec.
I'm going to assume you agree with me. I guess?
Unrelated:
Someone should explain that to the W3C then since that
is standard practice there.
Unrelated:
Of course, this is a lot
better than the IETF which just abandons specs once
they throw them out there. Trying to figure out how to
implement NNTP support from the relevant IETF specs
was a joke given how far practice had outpaced the
much outdated RFCs.
Like I said, as someone who's spent the past few years
working with specs produced by standards bodies I find
the complaints about RSS 2.0, etc to consist mainly of
nitpicking.
That's a nice opinion. Of course, you've already stated as much, so I'm not sure why you're repeating yourself.
Robert Sayre
