On Mon, 08 Nov 2004 14:07:02 -0800, Tim Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PaceDateModified: No consensus. Close it. No consensus to reject it either. Doesn't that mean it should go back on the revisit list? (In my estimation it only swerved around inclusion because of the chair lying in the road). > PacePersonConstruct: ... I'd be happy to trust Rob and > MNot's editorial judgment to figure out how to work that consensus into > the draft. +1, ditto for the other issues you mentioned. Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com
