On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 11:54:28 +0100, Danny Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 10:21:00 +0000, Bill de h�ra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Send a link. I'll explain it. Wind whistles...tumbleweed drifts by... > Choosing latest entry from multiple feeds: > http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/msg10894.html > > Single feed for project documentation: > http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/msg10931.html > > I've also not seen any considered response to Bob's point, that at > entries published after a particular atom:updated would implicitly be > treated as equivalent. > > [[ > This implies that if I find multiple versions of an entry, I should > ignore all but the *first* instance of an entry found with any > particular atom:updated value. I should not be concerned with > identifying the "latest" version since any version that shares the > same atom:updated value is equivalent in the opinion of the publisher. > The opinion of the publisher is paramount in these issues. > ]] > http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/msg10930.html > > > > Cheers, > Danny. > > -- > > http://dannyayers.com > -- http://dannyayers.com
