On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 21:10:57 +0000, Bill de h�ra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Danny Ayers wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 11:54:28 +0100, Danny Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 10:21:00 +0000, Bill de h�ra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>>Send a link. I'll explain it. > > > > Wind whistles...tumbleweed drifts by... > > > Danny, > > My apologies. I'm shipping 2 systems. This explanation requires more > than a dashed off or reactive mail and won't get looked at until next > weekend. If that's too long for you, I concede. > > The above observation, I believe, could have been phrased: > > "Have you had a chance to do this yet?" > > and would perhaps have been more conducive.
My apologies, you're right of course. It was just meant as a reminder, my impatience was because your "I'll explain it." seemed to have been left like a QED in the margin a la Fermat. But I hope the shipping goes well, and look forward to your response. Email is a poor medium for nuances, but you should know by now not to take anything I say too seriously... Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com
