If we must put up with this nonsense, I need to ask, is rel="http://www.iana.org/assignments/TBD/related"; a valid value? What about "../TBD/related"? I don't see the benefit of mapping them onto a default namespace, so if those 2 are valid then doing a mapping the relative URI onto a base and doing URI comparison is a waste of cycles. Why not do what we do with content type and have the values be names on their own? And why are we using capital letters for idiots for that and not for this? Please reconcile the two.
Graham
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
