Tim Bray wrote:
This would give us a namespace name something like "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:atom" which is OK I guess. I said that I liked HTTP URIs for namespace names because they leave open the door for putting some helpful info there and for things like RDDL.
So do I. But I could live with something like @rddl as well.
So... what's the sentiment of the WG? -Tim
Use the IETF way. Add an attribute on the root that contains a PURL for the docco.
Having people waffle on one more time about what's behind a namespace will not be conducive to getting things done.
cheers Bill
