Re: Atom namespace name

[Martin Duerst]

(BAt 09:12 04/11/11, Asbj$B�S(Bn Ulsberg wrote:
(B >
(B >On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 15:16:37 -0800, Tim Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(B >
(B >> So... what's the sentiment of the WG?  -Tim
(B >
(B >Although it might be a lot of fuzz (I don't understand why, but
(B >nonetheless..), I think we shuld strive to have an HTTP-based namespace
(B >URI for just the same reasons you enumerated.
(B >
(B >Having the namespace URI point to an informational, human-readable HTML
(B >page is imho extremely important for Atom if we want it to be 'newbie' and
(B >'View Source Clan' friendly. If we want it to be by techies for techies,
(B >any URI scheme will do the job.
(B
(BI agree.
(B
(B >What domain and space the HTTP URI points to is not very important, imho.
(B >purl.org has been used in examples and such, but anything would do it for
(B >me.
(B
(BYes. Something at IANA would do, too. Please note that we are already
(Basking IANA to permanently commit to a specific (base) URI for the
(Blinking registry (PaceFieldingLinks).
(B
(BRegards,    Martin.