I thought the whole point was to indicate to feed readers that a particular entry was revoked/removed/deleted/whatever. Hence this discussion should stay in 'syntax' unless I misunderstand the scope of 'protocol'.
Lance On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:27:25 +0100, Asbj�rn Ulsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 12:16:08 +0100, Arve Bersvendsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > I recently checked out my comment feeds in Bloglines, and noticed one > > problem: > > > > The spam I take so much care to delete from my feeds remain visible in > > BlogLines, and probably at a heap of other sources. Instead of forcing > > aggregator services to implement spam filters, I'd rather just be able > > to tell them myself by indicating that an entry is revoked. > > > > How could we do this? > > > > <entry:revoked>2004-12-31T12:00:00Z</entry:revoked> ? > > Other than the exact syntax (we probably shouldn't have an 'entry' > namespace), I think this is a good idea. I think it belongs more in the > protocol than the format, though. > > -- > Asbj�rn Ulsberg -=|=- [EMAIL PROTECTED] > �He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away�
