On 24/04/2007, at 8:53 PM, Franklin Tse wrote:
Two issues found.
In "Example: Atom-formatted Complete Feed", there is no
<description> element in Atom 1.0, <subtitle> should be used instead.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom";
xmlns:fh="http://purl.org/syndication/history/1.0";>
<title>NetMovies Queue</title>
<description>The DVDs you'll receive next.</description>
Oops; I think you reported this previously, no? Will fix this in AUTH48.
Also,
7.2. Informative References
[RSS2] Winer, D., "RSS 2.0 Specification",
2005, <http://
blogs.law.harvard.edu/
tech/rss>.
Should the reference be changed to http://www.rssboard.org/rss-
specification by the RSS Advisory Board?
If someone can point me at a definitive place where Dave Winer cedes
control of the spec to the RSS Advisory Board, and says that that's
the new URI to use, I'll change it; I don't really want to dig too
deep into the morass of RSS politics.
I asked him and didn't get a response, and that's the most widely-
cited URL out there, according to the search engines; since it's an
informative reference in any case, it's good enough.
Cheers and thanks,
--
Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
