Mark Nottingham wrote:
Thanks, Roger. After looking over the links that Randy and others kindly
forwarded, consulting with the AD, and hearing nothing from Dave, it
looks like we'll go with this link.
Did you check Dave's weblog? He's recently restored, and is actively
promoting, an alternate link:
http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/04/30/wikipediaEditing.html
These dueling versions of the RSS 2.0 specification differ in minor
details (e.g., range of skipHours), major features (permissability
namespaced attributes on existing RSS elements), and roadmap.
- Sam Ruby
