> Oops; I think you reported this previously, no? Will fix this in AUTH48.
Ya, I have reported this previously :) > If someone can point me at a definitive place where Dave Winer cedes > control of the spec to the RSS Advisory Board, and says that that's > the new URI to use, I'll change it; I don't really want to dig too > deep into the morass of RSS politics. > > I asked him and didn't get a response, and that's the most widely- > cited URL out there, according to the search engines; since it's an > informative reference in any case, it's good enough. I have Cc-ed this email to the RSS-Public Mailing List and hopefully there will be an answer. Thanks, Franklin Tse ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Nottingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Franklin Tse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "atom-syntax" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 19:08 Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-09.txt > > On 24/04/2007, at 8:53 PM, Franklin Tse wrote: > >> Two issues found. >> >> In "Example: Atom-formatted Complete Feed", there is no >> <description> element in Atom 1.0, <subtitle> should be used instead. >> >> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> >> <feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"; >> xmlns:fh="http://purl.org/syndication/history/1.0";> >> <title>NetMovies Queue</title> >> <description>The DVDs you'll receive next.</description> > > Oops; I think you reported this previously, no? Will fix this in AUTH48. > > >> Also, >> >> 7.2. Informative References >> >> >> [RSS2] Winer, D., "RSS 2.0 Specification", >> 2005, <http:// >> blogs.law.harvard.edu/ >> tech/rss>. >> >> Should the reference be changed to http://www.rssboard.org/rss- >> specification by the RSS Advisory Board? > > If someone can point me at a definitive place where Dave Winer cedes > control of the spec to the RSS Advisory Board, and says that that's > the new URI to use, I'll change it; I don't really want to dig too > deep into the morass of RSS politics. > > I asked him and didn't get a response, and that's the most widely- > cited URL out there, according to the search engines; since it's an > informative reference in any case, it's good enough. > > Cheers and thanks, > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > >
