I think lastBuildDate and managingEditor should not be removed since they are equal to atom:updated and atom:author respectively.
Franklin ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Holderness" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "atom-syntax Syntax" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, 23 May, 2007 14:27 Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-10.txt > > Nothing that I noticed error wise but, since you asked, I personally think > it would be clearer if you removed all the optional channel elements > (language, pubDate, lastBuildDate, docs, generator, managingEditor and > webMaster) from the RSS examples and made the message content the same as > the Atom examples. At least I would think changing the links might be a good > idea (example.org rather than nasa.gov). > > Not a big deal though - just a suggestion. > > Regards > James > >> Anything else? >> >> On 22/05/2007, at 11:34 PM, James Holderness wrote: >> >>> >>>> Also, some <guid> and <link> elements do not point to the same URL. >>>> This is a bad practice that should not be included in a specification. >>>> >>>> The <link> element should be removed or a 'isPermaLink="false"' >>>> attribute should be added to the <guid> element. >>> >>> At the very least the urn <guid> needs an isPermaLink attribute set to >>> false. Using a urn as a permalink is simply not valid. > >
