Oops. Yes... should be "lastBuildDate" instead of "pubDate"... Sorry...
Franklin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Nottingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Franklin Tse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "James Holderness" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "atom-syntax" <[email protected]> Date: Sunday, 10 June, 2007 18:39 Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-10.txt > The draft currently says; > >> In RSS 2.0-formatted feeds, two entries are duplicates if they have >> the same guid element. The update time of an entry is not defined >> by RSS 2.0, but the feed-level update time can be determined by the >> pubDate element. > > Should 'pubDate' be changed to 'lastBuildDate'? > > > > On 23/05/2007, at 6:22 PM, Franklin Tse wrote: > >> >> In section 4.2 of the draft, >> >> In Atom-formatted archived feeds, two entries are duplicates if >> they >> have the same atom:id element. The update time of an entry is >> determined by its atom:updated element, and likewise the update >> time >> of a feed document is determined by its feed-level atom:updated >> element. >> >> In RSS 2, the equivalent of atom:feed/atom:updated is rss/channel/ >> lastBuildDate. I think it is a good practice to always include it. >> >> By the way, do publishers need to use an atom:id element in RSS 2 >> feeds since there is no equivalent in RSS 2? >> >> Franklin >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "James Holderness" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "atom-syntax" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Wednesday, 23 May, 2007 15:37 >> Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-10.txt >> >>> >>> Franklin Tse wrote: >>>> I think lastBuildDate and managingEditor should not be >>>> removed since they are equal to atom:updated and atom:author >>>> respectively. >>> >>> I considered that, but it seems to me the only reason they are in >>> the Atom >>> examples is because Atom requires those elements - they don't >>> actually add >>> anything illustrative to the example. However, if you really want >>> to make >>> the examples identical element-for-element, then the Atom feeds >>> should all >>> include a subtitle element to match RSS's required channel >>> description. >>> IMHO. >>> >>> Regards >>> James >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > >
