* Paul Hoffman wrote: >Because servers are allowed (and in some cases required) to modify >the contents of an Entry Document before publishing it, a client that >signs a Entry Document should only do so with the intention of the >server possibly validating the submission; the client cannot assume >that the signature will be valid when viewed by a third party, or >that the server will even publish the client's signature.
Could you point out where the draft requires making changes? I so far assumed you can make a conforming implementation that does little but passing through the content I want to publish as-is, your text seems to rule that out. If it is possible to make an APP implementation that almost always keeps my content unmodified, clients that know they are talking to such a server should not violate the "should only". -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
