Re: Atom protocol and digital signatures

[James M Snell]

Paul Hoffman wrote:
> At 1:59 PM -0700 6/19/07, Tim Bray wrote:
>> On Jun 19, 2007, at 1:50 PM, James M Snell wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>   Because servers allow allowed (and in some cases required) to modify
>>>   the contents of an Entry Document before publishing it, signatures
>>>   within an entry will likely only be useful to the server to which it
>>>   is being sent. Clients cannot assume that the signature will be valid
>>>   when viewed by a third part, or that the server will event publish
>>>   client's signature.
>>
>> I think that's an improvement.  -T
> 
> s/third part/third party/
> s/event publish/even publish the/

s/allow allowed/are allowed/

damn... who typed this :-)

- james