The spec says if I don't have a <content> then I must have a <link @rel="alternate">. Can I assume the later is a substitution of the former if I don't want to provide any <content>?
The reason I don't want to provide <content> is due to its nature of human consumption (while in my application I'm mainly targeting at machine processing, so I don't want to parse <content> but prefer to just have an HTTP address to retrieve the content), also there's a "no composite MIME type" clause for <content @src> that may potentially limit the resources I can include in as content. But then it can also be confusing if I don't have a <content> element but have multiple <link @rel="alternate">. I can't be sure which resource should be treated as the real content or they should all be treated equally as the contents. Thanks, Zhiwu Xie
