Thanks a lot for the reply. But going this way I'll also have to supply
<summary>, which serves no apparent use in my application. I surely can
leave it empty but then it still feels like an intentional twist to the
<content>'s original purpose. Does this matter?
Or can I interpret <link rel="alternate"> as the same as <content @src>?
Thanks,
Zhiwu Xie
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
Hi Zhiwu,
* A. Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-24 21:10]:
you probably want to use `<content @src>`.
err I meant “with no [EMAIL PROTECTED] attribute.”
The restrictions apply to the type given in the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
attribute, but it’s fine to omit that.
Regards,
