Joe Gregorio wrote:
Is there a conflict with the Feed History I-D? No, since the
rel term "next", and others are defined in terms of a "Paged Feed"
and not an "Archived Feed". The former having "some kind" of
order, the second having an explicit ordering by "atom:updated".
When you see a feed can you tell whether it is a "paged feed" or a
"collection feed"? I can't.
In that case, how can you correctly interpret rel="next" as "paged feed"
allows lossy feed paging and "collection feed" requires lossless paging?