Am 18.12.2007 um 06:57 schrieb James M Snell:
[...]
Bottom line: we should avoid over-overloading atom:entry. Regardless of
the specific solution required, some invention is required and clients
will have to take specific actions to support tombstones, so we are not
saving anyone any work by reusing atom:entry for this and we run the
risk of confusing clients. The x:deleted tombstone element avoids that
risk entirely, which for me, makes it the superior solution.

+1

Very good summary.

--
<green/>bytes GmbH, Hafenweg 16, D-48155 Münster, Germany
Amtsgericht Münster: HRB5782





Reply via email to