> 1. deleted-entry is now part of the Atom namespace I am concerned about this change, since I care about validation of atom feeds containing extensions.
It appears that extensions (both standard and proprietrary ones) are being designed without creating full schemas. I fear that lack of schemas eventually hampers evolution of atom. To me, a different namespace for deleted-entry makes much more sense, since the use of NVDL for atom validation becomes more natural. Cheers, -- MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
