Noted. FWIW, I'm happy either way. - James
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) wrote: >> 1. deleted-entry is now part of the Atom namespace > > I am concerned about this change, since I care about validation > of atom feeds containing extensions. > > It appears that extensions (both standard and proprietrary ones) > are being designed without creating full schemas. I fear that > lack of schemas eventually hampers evolution of atom. > > To me, a different namespace for deleted-entry makes much more > sense, since the use of NVDL for atom validation becomes more > natural. > > Cheers, >
