On 16/01/2008, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > All it would really take are implementors willing to support the > extensions once they were defined and a group of individuals willing to > do the work to define them. I'm willing to help. > > - James >
I'm wary of making commitments that I can't keep, having recently had to drop out of one community due to most of my spare hacking time being taken up with working at the startup that I'm currently with, but I'd like to take this forward if possible. Any suggestions for ways to do that? James > Sylvain Hellegouarch wrote: > > > > Peter Keane a écrit : > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, James M Snell wrote: > >> > >>> I had been involved in some discussions a while back geared towards > >>> working on a standard set of media extensions derived from the itunes > >>> and yahoo media extensions. Unfortunately, that work never > >>> progressed. Such work would certainly not be unwelcome. > >>> > >>> - James > >> > >> Absolutely. It would be a huge boon for the sort of work we are > >> trying to do. MIT's OpenCourseWare, ITunes U, etc. are all the rage. > >> A Media-rich Atom standard would be a no-brainer for that area (and > >> with FeedSync or a FeedSync-type standard along with it, a very > >> powerful platform indeed). > >> > >> Any thoughts on how such a process might be re-booted? > > > > I concur and I'd join such work if it existed. > > > > - Sylvain
