On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Sylvain Hellegouarch wrote:
I'm not sure however to understand what the atom:link could provide. If it was to specify a given taxonomy, why not define it in terms of atom:category/@term in a given scheme instead?
Actually, I was thinking of using atom:link to capture the bits of metadata that would vary per media file. Ex:
<entry> ... <link rel="enclosure" href="1234.mp3" type="audio/mpeg"> <x:channelMode>mono</x:channelMode> <x:bitrate>128<x:bitrate> </link> <link rel="enclosure" href="1234.mp3" type="audio/wav"> <x:channelMode>stereo</x:channelMode> <x:samplingRate>44.1<x:samplingRate> </link> <link rel="http://xxxxx/thumbnail" href="1234.jpg" type="image/jpeg"> <x:height>120</x:height> <x:width>120</x:width> </link> </entry> --peter
- Sylvain
