Does anyone here know the status of this effort by the w3c:
Comparing Media RSS formats
http://www.w3.org/2005/07/media-and-rss.html
the page was last updated 7/27/2005
--peter keane
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Eric Lunt wrote:
I'd definitely be interested in this as well, and we could update
FeedBurner's namespace translation to help ease the transition between old
and new clients so that even if someone used the new namespace, for example,
we could still generate the appropriate iTunes tags when iTunes comes
calling for the feed. I still think there's a lot of promise in the Media
RSS namespace, but the lack of activity and support around it makes me a
little hesitant to recommend it.
- Eric
On Jan 16, 2008 9:55 AM, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All it would really take are implementors willing to support the
extensions once they were defined and a group of individuals willing to
do the work to define them. I'm willing to help.
- James
Sylvain Hellegouarch wrote:
Peter Keane a écrit :
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, James M Snell wrote:
I had been involved in some discussions a while back geared towards
working on a standard set of media extensions derived from the itunes
and yahoo media extensions. Unfortunately, that work never
progressed. Such work would certainly not be unwelcome.
- James
Absolutely. It would be a huge boon for the sort of work we are
trying to do. MIT's OpenCourseWare, ITunes U, etc. are all the rage.
A Media-rich Atom standard would be a no-brainer for that area (and
with FeedSync or a FeedSync-type standard along with it, a very
powerful platform indeed).
Any thoughts on how such a process might be re-booted?
I concur and I'd join such work if it existed.
- Sylvain
