On 3/12/08 12:51 PM, Bill de hOra wrote:
The feedvalidator follows the RNC and marks this construct as an error<category term='holidays' label='Holidays'> <link rel='alternate' type='application/atom+xml' href='https://example.org/dehora/categories/holidays' /> </category>Why - it would be nice to supply a feed link for a category, and not do weird things with the scheme/term attributes. And I note that atom:link has the same restriction in the RNC.
What's wrong with using the scheme attribute to convey this information? Specifically, I use an AtomPub Category Document for my schemes. This way, I don't have to use a Feed to represent a listing of categories.
-- Ben Ramsey http://benramsey.com/
