Brian Smith wrote:
Bill de hOra wrote:
2: the scheme is arguably not adequate to express something
like a category feed; it does tell you the vocabulary/type of
the category item, but not that there's an alternate/related resource.
I don't understand what you intend "alternate" to mean here. How can a feed be
an alternate representation of a category? Is the feed supposed to list entries that have
been marked with that category? Alternative categories that could be used instead?
Something else?
"related" might be better?
Bill
