Bill de hOra wrote: > 2: the scheme is arguably not adequate to express something > like a category feed; it does tell you the vocabulary/type of > the category item, but not that there's an alternate/related resource.
I don't understand what you intend "alternate" to mean here. How can a feed be an alternate representation of a category? Is the feed supposed to list entries that have been marked with that category? Alternative categories that could be used instead? Something else? Regards, Brian
