As the author of 4685 I'm a bit biased but I'm not sure I see the need
for the new rel attribute. in-reply-to would seem to cover the need well
enough.
- James
Bill de hOra wrote:
Antone Roundy wrote:
Martin Atkins wrote:
I suppose the general case is that when the user adds additional
metadata their entry becomes a pointer to the original item rather
than the item itself, so the id (and everything else, for that
matter) is different in this case.
That makes sense to me.
Me too.
The atom:source element isn't designed to capture that idea, so we're
looking at something along the lines of thr:in-reply-to or a new rel
attribute.
Bill
